Tarpon Research Opens New Understanding of Iconic Gamefish
New research led by the University of Massachusetts and funded by Bonefish & Tarpon Trust is providing a better understanding of the movements of tarpon, one of the most iconic gamefish on the planet.
The work leveraged networks of thousands of acoustic receivers that tracked 200 tarpon over more than five years. One of the key findings is that there are two distinct subgroups of tarpon, which has immediate implications for efforts to conserve the fish, known to anglers as the âSilver King.â
âEvery fish tells a story,â said Lucas Griffin, a postdoctoral researcher in environmental conservation at UMass Amherst and the paperâs lead author. âAnd yet, up to now, we havenât known all that much about tarpon.â
Tarpon are one of the most iconic salt-water fish in the Southeastern and Gulf states. Many an angler spends their life dreaming of hooking a 200-pound Silver King, fish which are known to fight fiercely, often leaping entirely clear of the water in their efforts to shake a hook. The tarpon fishery, which extends from Texas to the Carolinas in the U.S., is, by some estimates, a multi-million-dollar-per-year industry, and the fish is tied deeply to local culture.
Yet, despite the legendary toughness of the species, the tarpon is listed as âvulnerableâ by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, and their populations seem to have been affected by fishing, degraded water quality and habitat loss. Because tarpon are a long-lived fishâthey can live for 50 years or moreâand because they migrate great distances, they are especially vulnerable to the various threats that they may encounter when migrating over the course of their long lives.
Indeed, as Griffin and senior author, Andy Danylchuk, professor of fish conservation at UMass Amherst, showed in previous research, anglers and guides have reported a marked decrease in the tarpon fishery.
How, then, to track such a fish?
Part of the answer involves the high-tech world of acoustic telemetry, which involves two different devices: an acoustic receiver, anchored in place for years at a time, and a small acoustic transmitter, about the size of an AA battery, surgically implanted in tarpon. Every time a tagged fish swims within the detection range of a receiver, the receiver records the date, time and ID of that specific fish.
The transmitters canât be lost, they work continuously for at least five years and, because theyâre small, they donât potentially hinder the fishâs movement, in the way that larger, external electronic tags, such as satellite tags, can. âThereâs really no other way to get such a detailed understanding of where and when tarpon are migrating, and over so many years,â said Danylchuk, who, along with Griffin, previously demonstrated the power of acoustic telemetry networks.
But simple technological capability isnât enough. Tracking the Silver King takes teamwork. So Griffin and Danylchuk teamed up with the Bonefish & Tarpon Trust other marine researchers and local fishing guides and anglers in the Southeastern U.S. and the Gulf of Mexico. They used collaborative networks of acoustic receivers that other scientists had set up to monitor various marine species, and to find enough fish to track, Griffin and Danylchuk worked closely with guides and anglers from the Florida panhandle to central South Carolina who would let them know when they landed a tarpon which could be fitted with a transmitter. And the pair took up hook and line themselves.
âAlthough tarpon are large and put up quite a fight, they are also fragile fish,â said Griffin. âWe had to worry about sharks, and when we did manage to hook a tarpon and bring it alongside the boat, we had to work very quickly and delicately to get the transmitter implanted.â
âAll hell breaks loose when you hook a tarpon,â Danylchuk added, âand they are very physically difficult to catch, which is why anglers love them.â But the work paid off: the team tagged 200 fish, of which 109 were tracked over the course of years. Every time one of these fish swam past one of the thousands of deployed receivers it was recorded, yielding a database of over 500,000 detections.
âItâs the most extensive database on tarpon movement to date,â said Griffin, and it gave the researchers a number of hitherto unknown plot points in tarponâs story.
It turns out that there are actually two distinct sub-groups of tarpon. Though previous research has shown that many tarpon congregate around the Florida Keys in the spring to spawn, this new research shows that one group predominantly migrates up the Southeast coast, while a second group heads for the Gulf of Mexico. Nor are these migration paths random: âit was amazing to see that many individual tarpon used the same migration routes from year to year,â said Griffin.
âWhat this tells us,â he added, âis that different groups of tarpon will encounter different threats.â For instance, tarpon in the Gulf of Mexico are likely to encounter harmful algal blooms and cross into states where it is still legal to harvest tarpon as trophies, while in the mid-Atlantic tarpon may be more impacted by changes in freshwater flow and the overharvest of their prey.
âThis tells us a number of things,â said Danylchuk. âFirst of all, our conservation measures need to reflect the fact that many of these tarpon aggregate and likely spawn in the Florida Keys.â But Danylchuk also pointed to the need for policies tailored to specific groups of tarpon. âTarpon along the Atlantic coast have a different set of conservation priorities than those in the Gulf, but because many converge in the Keys, our science indicates that policies and management for tarpon needs to be regional, not state by state.â
There is still more work to be done, and the team is currently working to understand how tarpon diet differs for the two migratory groupsâresearch powered by this dataset. âThe power of this technology,â says Danylchuk, âis that we can use it to address so many questions critical to the application of the science to the real world.â